The National Green Tribunal (NGT) of India is a unique judicial authority constituted to address environmental disputes and implement environmental laws. This authority was established through the ...

In the case of Ved Singh vs. ITO (ITAT Delhi), the taxpayer Ved Singh challenged a penalty levied under Section 271B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, amounting to ₹1,09,807 for the assessment year 2017-18 ...

The TReDS platform empowers MSMEs by providing quicker access to working capital, enabling them to thrive and grow 🌟 in a competitive market. By onboarding more companies, this platform will further ...

Answer: By reflecting accurate invoice and ITC information in the IMS, the system helps align supplier and recipient records, reducing discrepancies that could trigger mismatch notices from the tax ...

Proposed review of the definition of Unpublished Price Sensitive Information (UPSI) under SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015 to bring regulatory clarity, certainty and uniformity ...

In Mohd Javed vs. Income Tax Officer (ITO), the Delhi ITAT addressed an appeal concerning a penalty under Section 271B of the Income Tax Act, imposed due to unreported turnover. Javed, a commission ...

1. From time to time, the departments of SEBI receive varied forms of communication from registered intermediaries/ regulated entities seeking clarification on the implementation of specific ...

ITAT Ahmedabad held that benefit of deduction under section 54EC of the Income Tax Act allowed since nexus between advance received towards sale of property and investment made in NHAI bonds ...

ITAT Ahmedabad held that dismissal of appeal by CIT (A) on technical/ procedural aspect merely because the appeal was filed manually instead of e-filing unjustified as assessee was not given an ...

ITAT Bangalore held that payments made by [Google Ireland Limited] GIL towards Adwords program is not in the nature of royalty or FTS [Fees for Technical Service] and hence the same is not taxable in ...

ITAT Chennai held that action of AO based on jurisdictional High Court decision as prevalent on the specified time, which was later on reversed by the Supreme Court, cannot be held to be erroneous and ...

ITAT Chennai held that an AO is not permitted to take different stand on the same issue and same set of facts over different years. Thus, exemption u/s. 11 granted in spite of the fact that return was ...