This series of articles previews changes in EJB 3.1. EJB 3.0 brought simplicity to Java EE 5 by moving away from a heavyweight programming model. EJB 3.1 aims to build on those successes by moving ...

Java and EJB are complex, and it will take time for a programmer to learn about them. But the complexity of Java and EJB programming is dwarfed, in my experience, by a confusing array of configuration ...

It introduces a method call paradigm by providing two programming models: a server-side model, for developing Web services endpoints using Java classes or stateless EJB components, and a client ...

The other way is based on the Enterprise JavaBeans (EJB) programming model — the web service is implemented as a stateless session bean that runs in an EJB container.

COBOL applications have involved huge investments in both money and resources. The last thing you want to do is throw this investment away and rewrite it all in Java.

This fourth installment of Monson-Haefel's Guide to Enterprise JavaBeans describes the EJB Timer Service API, its use with entity, stateless session, and message-driven beans, and provides some ...

This is targeted to be made more generically available for POJOs. Now, would this make the EJB programming model obsolete? Only time and developers will tell.

At its core is the Enterprise JavaBeans (EJB) programming model, which lets developers create reusable pieces of software code and is a direct competitor to Microsoft's programming model.

At its core is the Enterprise JavaBeans (EJB) programming model, which lets developers create reusable pieces of software code and is a direct competitor to Microsoft's programming model.

In the hot Web software development market, Sun Microsystems, IBM, Oracle, and others support the Enterprise JavaBeans (EJB) programming model, while Microsoft has its own programming model.